The Pomodoro Technique for Existential Crises

On how to timebox your dread

You’re staring at a blank page at 11 PM on a Wednesday, and the thing that’s blocking you isn’t writer’s block or laziness. It’s the sudden, crushing awareness that you’ve got maybe fifty years left if you’re lucky, and you’ve already spent two of them scrolling through algorithmic content designed to keep you numb. Your to-do list isn’t a productivity aid anymore. It’s a spreadsheet of your own mortality.

This is the moment when the Pomodoro Technique stops being about getting more done and becomes something else entirely: a philosophical decision to break infinity into manageable pieces. Not because you’re optimising for hustle culture or chasing some Silicon Valley dream of biohacking your way to success. But because accepting that time is finite, and that you can only ever spend it twenty-five minutes at a time, is actually the most honest thing you can do with a life that doesn’t come with a manual.

The Pomodoro Technique isn’t about productivity. It’s about accepting that you’re going to die, and in the meantime, you might as well set a timer.

The Origin Story (That Nobody Thinks About)

Francesco Cirillo invented the Pomodoro Technique in the late 1980s as a university student struggling to focus. He grabbed a tomato-shaped kitchen timer, set it for ten minutes, and committed to working without distraction until it rang. He called it a pomodoro—Italian for tomato—and the name stuck because apparently, serious productivity systems benefit from a touch of absurdism. Over thirty years later, millions of people use this method, and most of them think it’s about working harder.

They’re half-right, but they’re missing the philosophy underneath.1

The Pomodoro Technique’s real genius is that it doesn’t pretend you can focus forever. It acknowledges something that productivity culture usually avoids: human attention is finite, fragile, and deeply neurological. You can’t run a mental marathon. Your dopamine systems weren’t designed for eight-hour focus sprints. Evolution gave you the ability to hunt, create, and solve problems in bursts—then rest. Then repeat.

When you set a Pomodoro, you’re not accepting a limitation. You’re accepting reality.

This matters because existential anxiety—the kind that creeps in at 3 AM when you’re thinking about climate change, your student loans, the fact that you’ve been alive for thirty-four years and still don’t know what you’re doing—isn’t solved by willpower or positive thinking. It’s solved by making the infinite finite. By taking the question “How do I fix my life?” and breaking it into “What can I do in the next twenty-five minutes?”

A study from the University of California, Irvine found that it takes an average of twenty-three minutes to refocus after a distraction.2 But the Pomodoro isn’t asking you to focus for twenty-three minutes. It’s asking you to commit to something smaller: one work interval, one break, one cycle. Not forever. Just until the timer rings.

This is where it becomes interesting for the existentially anxious. Your brain doesn’t have to solve mortality today. It just has to solve the thing in front of you for twenty-five minutes. That’s not avoidance. That’s strategy.

The Rest Is Not Optional

The technique also functions as an implicit acknowledgement of burnout’s real mechanics. You’re not supposed to work for twelve Pomodoros straight without talking to another human being or remembering that your body exists. Every twenty-five minutes of work is paired with a five-minute break. Every four cycles, you take a longer break: fifteen to thirty minutes. This isn’t advice. It’s structure. It’s saying, “Your rest is as important as your work, and here’s a system that forces you to remember that.”

This is radical in cultures that treat sleep as a luxury and burnout as a personality trait.

The Japanese concept of “ma”—the power of emptiness or space—is relevant here.3 In design, music, and philosophy, “ma” describes how the empty space is just as important as the filled space. A song without silence is just noise. A life without rest is just burnout. The Pomodoro is a system that bakes “ma” into productivity. It says: the break is part of the work.

Making the Infinite Finite

Here’s how the Pomodoro Technique actually works as a response to existential crisis:

First: It Makes the Abstract Concrete

“I need to fix my life” is paralyzing because it has no beginning, middle, or end. “I need to write 500 words on this blog post in the next twenty-five minutes” is achievable. Your brain can parse it. Your nervous system can settle. You’re not solving forever; you’re solving today’s twenty-five minutes. Then tomorrow’s. Then the day after that.

The ancient stoics called this “premeditatio malorum”—thinking about the worst case so you could prepare for it. The Pomodoro Technique is the secular, timer-based version: you’re accepting that time is limited, then you’re working within that limit.

Research from psychology professor Roy Baumeister shows that humans have a finite pool of willpower each day, and that willpower depletes faster when you’re making decisions about infinite possibilities.4 The Pomodoro removes infinite possibility. It says: for the next twenty-five minutes, you only have to decide about this one thing. Not your career. Not your purpose. This task.

Second: It Creates a Container for Work and Anxiety

One of the cruelest tricks of modern life is that our brains are designed to solve problems, and when we give them a work problem, they immediately try to solve it. But work problems on finite deadlines can be solved. Existential problems cannot. So your brain gets stuck in a loop: trying to find a solution to something that doesn’t have one. It’s like a search engine running a query that returns infinite results.

The Pomodoro creates a container. For twenty-five minutes, you’re allowed to think about the work only. Not your worth. Not the thermodynamic heat death of the universe. Not whether you’re good enough. Just the work. Then, when the timer rings, you get five minutes to be anxious if you want to. To think about bigger things. To remember that you’re mortal. But by then, you’ve also accomplished something. You’ve moved the needle. You’ve got proof that you can do things despite the existential dread.

A study published in the Journal of Applied Psychology found that visible progress—even small progress—is one of the most effective ways to sustain motivation and reduce psychological strain.5 You don’t need to accomplish everything. You just need to accomplish the next twenty-five minutes. Every four cycles, you can look back and see four blocks of work done. That’s not nothing.

Third: Rest Becomes Structural, Not Optional

The five-minute break isn’t optional. It’s built into the system. This is important because existential anxiety often stems from a sense of perpetual inadequacy. You’re not doing enough because you’re comparing yourself to people who are also not doing enough but pretending they are. The Pomodoro says: no. Work happens. Then rest happens. Not because you’re weak. But because you’re human, and humans need rhythm.

During your five-minute break, you don’t check email. You don’t optimise the break. You just exist for five minutes. Get water. Look out a window. Feel the weight of your body in the chair. This is where the technique becomes almost meditative. You’re not trying to fix yourself. You’re just present for a few minutes. Then you go back to work.

Fourth: It Offers Proof That You Can Do Hard Things

This is the sneaky psychological win. You’re not just writing blog posts or finishing spreadsheets. You’re proving to yourself, neurologically, that you can commit to something and follow through. You can focus. You can create. You can do things that matter, even if you’re also anxious about whether anything matters.

Every time the timer rings and you’ve finished a Pomodoro, you’re firing neurons associated with completion and achievement. Not the dopamine spike of checking an email or scrolling a feed—those are cheap hits that wear off immediately. This is deeper. You’ve committed to something and done it. In a world where control feels illusory and the future feels uncertain, this is substantial.

People with depression and existential anxiety often struggle with self-efficacy—the belief that their actions have consequences.6 The Pomodoro Technique is a system that forces consequences into visibility. You can’t argue that you didn’t try if you sat down for twenty-five minutes and worked. You did the thing.

The Timer Keeps Ringing

The Pomodoro Technique won’t fix existential anxiety. Neither will any system, because existential anxiety isn’t a problem that productivity solves. It’s a fundamental part of being conscious in a universe that doesn’t explain itself.

But here’s what it might do: it might make the anxiety smaller. More manageable. Containerised. Instead of a constant hum under everything you do, it becomes the thing you think about during breaks. During the five minutes where you’re supposed to rest and you’re not allowed to work.

And maybe that’s the point. Maybe the most honest response to meaninglessness isn’t to create meaning at scale. It’s to set a timer for twenty-five minutes, do one true thing, and accept that you’re never going to solve forever.

You’re only ever going to solve right now. And sometimes, in the space between breaths, that’s enough.

The timer rings. You stand up. You take a break. Then you sit back down and set it again.


References

  1. Cirillo, F. (2018). The Pomodoro Technique: The Life-Changing Time Management System. Crown Publishers. 

  2. Ophir, E., Nass, C., & Wagner, A. D. (2009). “Cognitive control in media multitaskers.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106(37), 15583–15587. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0910340106 

  3. Kakuzo, O. (1906). The Book of Tea. Tuttle Publishing. (On the aesthetic principle of empty space in Japanese design philosophy.) 

  4. Baumeister, R. F., & Vohs, K. D. (2007). “Self-regulation and self-control: Selected works.” Psychology Press. 

  5. Amabile, T. M., & Kramer, S. J. (2011). “The progress principle: Using small wins to ignite joy, engagement, and creativity at work.” Harvard Business Review, 89(5), 46–52. 

  6. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. W.H. Freeman. 

Share: X (Twitter) Facebook LinkedIn